對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)邊江澤“分析員，信息和泡沫，金融與定量分析”對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)是教育部直屬的全國(guó)重點(diǎn)大學(xué)，國(guó)家“211工程”首批重點(diǎn)建設(shè)高校。對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)高級(jí)課程研修班根據(jù)學(xué)位委員會(huì)、教育部(2013)36號(hào)文件，自2014年起，原"課程研修班課程班"更改為"人員課程研修班"，讀研考生申請(qǐng)碩士學(xué)位流程及要求不變。

　　對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)邊江澤“分析員，信息和泡沫，金融與定量分析”對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)邊江澤等研究了2007年股市泡沫China.Using泡沫強(qiáng)度多種措施每只股票，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)股票顯著較小的氣泡對(duì)此有更大的分析師的覆蓋范圍。進(jìn)一步的研究表明分析師報(bào)道的泡沫強(qiáng)度的減弱作用較弱時(shí)，有分析家之間的更大的分歧。這表明，在有氣泡，一個(gè)通道，通過(guò)該分析師的覆蓋可以減少氣泡的轉(zhuǎn)售選擇理論線是通過(guò)協(xié)調(diào)投資者的信仰，從而降低其擴(kuò)散。存貨周轉(zhuǎn)提供了這種特殊信息的機(jī)制是一致的進(jìn)一步證據(jù)。以下是原文。

　　Abstract: We examine the 2007 stock market bubble in China.Using multiple measures of bubble intensity for each stock, we find significantly smaller bubbles in stocks for which there is greater analyst coverage. We further show that the abating effect of analyst coverage on bubble intensity is weaker when there is greater disagreement among analysts. This suggests that, in line with resale option theories of bubbles, one channel through which analyst coverage may mitigate bubbles is by coordinating investors’ beliefs and thus reducing its dispersion. Stock turnover provides further evidence consistent with this particular information mechanism.